Institutional and Management Principles

Management information systems may need revision if the nature or scopes of the project are revised during implementation. Therefore examine:

KEY ISSUES POSSIBLE RESPONSES
  • Are effective management systems in place?
  • Are the project planning and procurement and contracting mechanisms working effectively?
  • Does the quantity and quality of data collected match the needs of the project and permit effective monitoring and management decision-making?
  • Where management systems appear weak or open to abuse, discuss systems improvements with government.
  • Review the operation of systems established for data collection, storage and processing and make necessary revisions.
  • If the project scope or objectives are revised, ensure that management information systems are still appropriate.

 

Changes in the structure of implementing agencies may weaken (or improve) their capability to implement the project or programme. Therefore examine:

KEY ISSUES POSSIBLE RESPONSES
  • Have changes in the structure of the implementing agency, since financing was secured, altered their ability to implement the project?
  • As a consequence, does the schedule of project activity and the achievement of goals still seem realistic?
  • Re-assess the implementation schedule and propose revisions.
  • Identify if additional consultancy support may be required to meet shortfalls.
  • Consider whether other public or private sector agencies should be brought in.

Measures to improve inter-sector and sector coordination planning may meet with resistance, thereby hindering implementation. Therefore examine:

KEY ISSUES POSSIBLE RESPONSES
  • Are weaknesses in the strategic plan or developments in other sectors, or internal to the sector, affecting implementation?
  • If the project was predicated on institutional reforms, have these been carried out?
  • Are different actors of the sector and stakeholders fulfilling their roles and responsibilities?
  • Identify weaknesses in existing procedures for integrated planning, including roles and responsibilities, and recommend improvements.
  • Identify what remedial actions may be taken to reduce inter-sector or intra-sector conflicts and integrate implementation with other programmes and projects.
  • Monitor compliance with preconditions relating to institutional change, discuss shortcomings and try to find remedies. Where this is impossible, modify the project framework.

 

Sustainability of services requires that users and operators understand and fulfil their responsibilities for O&M. Therefore examine:

KEY ISSUES POSSIBLE RESPONSES
  • Is the strategy for handing over services to the public or private operating agency and/or users well-defined and feasible?
  • Are there maintenance strategy and plans in place?
  • Are the current O&M technologies efficient and adapted?
  • Are recurrent cost requirements ensured?
  • Ensure that the hand-over plan and associated training requirements are defined, running on schedule and being taken up as planned.
  • Support the establishment of a O&M strategy including the identification of appropriate technologies.
  • Ensure maintenance plans and mechanisms to address recurrent costs are in place.

 

There is a danger that training and capacity-building measures, defined at formulation, are cut back during implementation or are ineffectual. Therefore examine:

KEY ISSUES POSSIBLE RESPONSES
  • Are the implementing agencies managing project implementation – financial management, stakeholders participation, data collection, monitoring – satisfactorily?
  • Have suitable staff been recruited and retained to fill key project posts?
  • Is the agency developing its human resources over the long term?
  • Is there a need for strengthening the implementing agency’s management capacity in the short term?
  • Where under-performance is evident, discuss with the implementing agency and identify remedial actions.
  • Verify that suitable trained staff have been engaged as required. If not, identify ways to attract and retain suitably qualified staff.
  • Verify that training is providing the required skills.
  • Review the agency’s human resource development strategy and make recommendations for improvements.
  • Identify what additional consultancy support may be required and how it may be funded.

 

 

  • d.